Solving the problems of unsustainability
The scholarship of sustainability
Our world is now afflicted with a crisis of sustainability, which is considered to be the greatest challenge that human civilization has faced in its recorded history. We, however, are yet to produce an effective intellectual tradition in addressing this crisis owing to a constraint that is presented by the prevalence of a compartmentalized division and narrowed vision in the exercise of human scholarship. As the problems of unsustainability exist in the totalities of things/realities, the provision of an effective intellectual treatment of sustainability would, therefore, require the creation of an intellectual capability for the production of sound knowledge on the totalities of these things/realities. This capability equates to an ability to systematically analyze various aspects and elements of knowledge that are associated with these things/realities.
The scope for the creation of this intellectual capability does, however, not align with the reductionist mode of inquiry owing to the epistemological and methodological limits of the latter, which, in the first place, had unwittingly facilitated the emergence of the current crisis of sustainability through the production of fragmented scientific and technological advancements that produce pragmatically less compatible or conflicting artifacts. While the creation of that capability—which represents a new mode of intellectual inquiry—would, instead, require the utilization of a wider, non-reductionist yet robust intellectual lens; the avenue of knowledge that is to be resulted from the exercise of this new mode of intellectual inquiry is termed as the scholarship of sustainability.
The theory of integrated knowledge creation
The theory of integrated knowledge creation dictates: “The capacity for the production of new knowledge on the totality of any defined thing/reality with respect to sustainability is empirically present within various aspects and elements of knowledge that are associated with that thing/reality, where the new knowledge could rigorously be synthesized through the appropriation of a bottom-up analysis of an empirical nature.” (Hossain 2025) This theory was produced by Hossain (2025) on the basis of the positive display of three traits, namely, ‘fundamental nature’, ‘empirical capacity’ and ‘functional-intellectual capability’ by a novel intellectual process, which was constructed in Hossain (2025) to represent a wider, non-reductionist yet robust intellectual lens, necessary for the provision of an effective intellectual treatment of sustainability. This theory unearthed the foundation of the scholarship of sustainability as a new avenue of knowledge.
Solving the problems of unsustainability through the exercise of the scholarship of sustainability
Three foundational requirements for the creation of new knowledge through the exercise of the scholarship of sustainability were combined by Hossain (2025) to describe an artifact termed as integrated knowledge. Accordingly, Hossain (2025) defined this artifact as “knowledge that is produced on the totality of any defined thing/reality in attempting to study the same—i.e., the totality of the concerned thing/reality—through systematically analyzing various aspects and elements of knowledge, associated with that thing/reality, with respect to sustainability”. As the problems of unsustainability exist in the totalities of things/realities, the production of integrated knowledge through the exercise of the scholarship of sustainability could enable us in accurately understanding the statuses of the concerned things/realities with respect to sustainability, and form effective approaches for their sustainable management. Besides, it can also inform and/or guide integrative thinking, informed decision-making, and evidence-based formation and effective implementation of policies, as the exercise of these practices on the basis of presumptuous appreciations in relation to the statuses of things/realities with respect to sustainability may lead to the formation of ineffective approaches, besides causing potential wastes of valuable resources.
Reference
A. M. M. Maruf Hossain. (2025). The Intellectual Structure of Sustainability. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle UK, https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-0364-4196-8